Subject: RE: draft-raggarwa-rsvpte-pw-01.txt

From: Shahram Davari <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:16:59 -0800

Does the existing signaling method support MH-PW signaling, CAC and BW reservation?

-Shahram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of
> Thomas D. Nadeau
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 10:41 AM
> To: Stewart Bryant
> Cc: pwe3
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] draft-raggarwa-rsvpte-pw-01.txt
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> 	Personally speaking, I don't think that it is useful
> for the WG to spend time and effort re-inventing
> the wheel, so to speak, which is what this draft
> represents. We already have a protocol for
> signaling PWs that works, and is deployed. If
> there were some significant advantage to signaling
> PWs using an alternative means, I would think
> otherwise, but it seems this is just being proposed
> as an alternative means for achieving the same
> end result.
> 
> 	--Tom
> 
> 
> 
> > At IETF62 the authors of
> >
> > Setup and Maintenance of Pseudowires using RSVP-TE
> > ftp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-raggarwa-rsvpte-pw-01.txt
> >
> > asked for the draft to become a WG draft.
> >
> > What is the view of members of the PWE3 WG?
> >
> > Stewart
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
> 
> iD8DBQFCQY4dHwfkLUURkkwRAgbtAJ9Bpc/zSm0TungLQ/LOQOD8VXDr+ACfXkWS
> obq/1BEDNhqeTW+u8DzaYGU=
> =s7XE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>