Subject: Re: draft-raggarwa-rsvpte-pw-01.txt

From: Bruce Davie <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:04:02 -0500

I don't think it's helpful for the WG to propose another protocol for PW 
signalling before it has even finished standardizing the first one. Maybe 
when we have some consensus on the requirements for multi-segment PWs we'll 
decide that we need something beyond LDP and L2TPv3, but we're not at that 
point yet. So, at this time I oppose making this a WG draft.

Bruce

--On Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:31 AM +0000 Stewart Bryant 
<[email-masked]> wrote:

>
> At IETF62 the authors of
>
> Setup and Maintenance of Pseudowires using RSVP-TE
> ftp://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-raggarwa-rsvpte-pw-01.txt
>
> asked for the draft to become a WG draft.
>
> What is the view of members of the PWE3 WG?
>
> Stewart
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3