Subject: RE: Comments on [PWE3] I-DACTION:draft-ietf-pwe3-ms-pw-requirements-00.txt

From: "Chris Metz \(chmetz\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:19:12 -0400

<snipping> 

> 
> There was a fair amount of discussion on the list regarding 
> the need for the protocol to support IP addresses as well as 
> some other identifier. Suggest breaking v into two parts to 
> state these requirements more clearly.
> 
> 		v. The MS-PW signaling protocol MUST support 
> addressing U-PEs and S-PEs 
>                using IP addresses. This applies to use cases 
> where reachability to the IP 
>                address of the U-PEs and S-PEs are known 
> across potential domains of the MS-PW.
> 
> 		v'. In cases where the IP addresses of the U-PE 
> and S-PE are no known across 
>                 potential domains of the MS-PW (e.g., 
> security and confidentiality policies 
>                 prevent advertising IP reachability), 
> procedures MUST be provided to allow 
>                 dynamic setup of MS-PWs using some other identifier.
> 

Agree with the suggested changes here for supporting PW setups
based on IP addresses or some other identifier.

Chris 

_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3