Subject: [PWE3] Erratum 1578

From: Stewart Bryant <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:08:42 +0100

Matthew

Please can you take a look at the edited version of
erratum 1578

http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1578

I think that this is what you proposed as a resolution.

I am inclined to mark it as hold for document update
on the basis that it is unlikely that any one would
incorrectly implement the protocol due to this
error in the text.

- Stewart