Subject: RE: Crypto-agility requirements: Hop-by-hop vs. end-to-end (from Issue 303)

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:29:28 +0200

Bernard Aboba wrote

> A proposal for addressing this would be to state explicitly that
> solutions are only required to address hop-by-hop security.   
> more explanation is required, one or more of the following points
> might be included:
<...>

I think just stating this explicitly would be sufficient, and more 
explanation isn't needed...

Best regards,
Pasi

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>