Subject: [radext] (very temporary) AD review of draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-05

From: Stephen Farrell <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:11:58 +0000

Hiya,

Stefan asked if I could help process this while
Kathleen is still on leave.

So I read it and it seems fine to me, I've only
one nit. I'll start IETF LC for this momentarily,

My nit: 3.1 says: "a server SHOULD not" - that'd
be better as  "a server SHOULD NOT" I guess.

Cheers,
S.