Subject: RE: [rddp] IPsec & Markers

From: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 18:24:18 -0500

Somesh,

> As far as MPA is concerned, a lot of the discussion
> held previously was under the context of an
> experimental draft.

Actually, MPA is currently targeted to be Informational.
 
> My assumption is that if it is changes to go on
> the standards track, it would be entirely open
> for another round of discussions.

I don't think so.  My plan is to resolve technical issues,
get the draft through WG Last Call and then determine whether
to make it standards track in consultation with the ADs.
I believe the rough consensus of the WG is that it is
desirable that MPA be standards track.

How do you think Informational vs. Standards track affects
the technical content of the MPA draft?

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
[email-masked]        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On 
> Behalf Of Somesh Gupta
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 4:28 PM
> To: [email-masked]; Black
> Subject: RE: [rddp] IPsec & Markers
> 
> 
> David,
> 
> As far as MPA is concerned, a lot of the discussion
> held previously was under the context of an
> experimental draft.
> 
> My assumption is that if it is changes to go on
> the standards track, it would be entirely open
> for another round of discussions.
> 
> Looking forward to your comments on the topic.
> 
> Thanks,
> Somesh
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rddp mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp
> 

_______________________________________________
rddp mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp