Subject: [renum] Human-safe IPv6 draft

From: "George, Wes" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:00:55 -0400

I'd recommend reviewing this draft and commenting either to the authors or the opsec list with a mind towards how it might interact with renumbering. I've made some comments in opsec about the idea that making IPv6 addresses easy to remember reinforces the idea of not using DNS more consistently as a way to abstract the IP address from the name to ease renumbering.

draft-yourtchenko-opsec-humansafe-ipv6<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-opsec-3.pdf>

Thanks,

Wes

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.