Subject: RE: [rohc] ROHC: CSRC

From: "Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:59:15 +0100

According to RFC 3095, it is part of CRC-STATIC, correct. The only
fields part of CRC_DYNAMIC are those generally expected to change
on a packet-to-packet basis, i.e.:
- Total Length, Identification, Header Checksum
- Length field, Checksum 
- M-bit, sequence number field, and timestamp 

BR
/L-E

----Original Message----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
Behalf Of Sarkar, Biplab
Sent: den 3 januari 2006 10:38
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [rohc] ROHC: CSRC

> All,
> 
> 
> 
> I have a query.
> 
> 
> 
> Why do we have CSRC list to be a part of CRC-STATIC
> calculations [RFC3095: 5.7.7.6]?  I thought it should have been in
> CRC-DYNAMIC group. 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Biplab
> 
> 
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Biplab Sarkar
> 
> Starent Networks, Bangalore
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc