Subject: Re: [RPSEC] Re: draft-convery-bgpattack-00

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 13:09:16 -0500 (EST)

>While I think that this can have value, particularly for multihop
>arrangements, I thought that BGP was supposed to have a TTL=1, such
>that its packets couldn't get routed. (I know that zebra does not do this)

Multi-hop arrangements between BGP peers are possible and are used.

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec