Subject: RE: [RPSEC] Re: draft-convery-bgpattack-00

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:44:31 -0500 (EST)

>Also note that the perceived need for more security in BGP can't be all
>that high, as we can tell by the level of MD5 option deployment.

Sadly, "perceived need" has little to do with "actual need".

As we can tell from the level of IPSEC and security deployment compared with
the level of DDoS attacks from compromised or spoofed hosts.

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec