Subject: Re: [RPSEC] another example of peering topology check not catching

From: Sandy Murphy <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:20:49 -0500 (EST)

>No matter 
>what happens to the network, and no matter what I think about the path the 
>packet should take, the packet gets there.

But in some of my recent examples, the router advertises paths that
do *NOT* get the packet there, period.

The router has advertised that it has a route, but there's nothing behind
that advertisement - no peer has provided a route that could work.
Surely that is not a good thing?

--Sandy

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec