Subject: adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft

From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:52:29 +0000

Support

Jim Uttaro

>draft-shand-remote-lfa was presented favorably this last IETF.  There

is known IPR

associated with it on file ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1770/ )

 This draft presents

a solution for IP/LDP fast-reroute that does not guarantee 100%

coverage but can substantially

improve coverage over LFAs.

We would like to initiate a WG poll to determine whether to adopt

draft-shand-remote-lfa.

We are, of course, interested in opinions and reasoning rather than

simple yes/no.

Thanks,

Alia