Subject: FW: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt

From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:26:12 +0000

Hi:

This draft responds to a suggestion by Stewart during the RTGWG meeting in Atlanta. Stewart suggested that we leave a written record on the presentation comparing ARC and MRT.
Since both technical solutions are subject to changes, this work can only be a snapshot that represent the best understanding/ knowledge of the authors at that particular time.

It is unclear to the author whether we should maintain this document overtime or just clean it up and publish with proper caution words. 

What do you think?

Pascal

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: lundi 21 janvier 2013 00:12
To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt
Revision:	 00
Title:		 Available Routing Constructs
Creation date:	 2013-01-21
WG ID:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 18
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-rtgwg-arc-vs-mrt-00

Abstract:
   This draft compares the capabilities offered by the Available Routing
   Construct (ARC) and the Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) techniques in
   order to support applicability statements.

The IETF Secretariat