Subject: Re: WG Adoption Requested for draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01

From: Levente Csikor <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:36:41 +0200

Hi!
I've just realized a small typo in 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01.
In Sec. 2.2, in Figure 2 the path from PE1 to PEx is 
*R9-R8-R7-R10-R6-PEx*, however, the text below the figure says:

"In the figure 2, let us consider the traffic coming from PE1 to PEx. 
Nominal path is *R9-R8-R7-R6-PEx*" -> R10 is missing.

Every other things seem correct :)

Regards,
Levente

On 04/23/2013 12:48 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The period for comments has ended.
>
> We received 11 comments supporting the adoption, which included 2 of 
> the 3 contributors and 3 of the 4 authors.  Given that and the support 
> at the last meeting, there is consensus to adopt the work.
>
> Also, all the authors and contributors have confirmed that they are 
> not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
>
> Authors:  Please republish the draft with the updated name 
> draft-rtgwg-lfa-manageability.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On 4/2/13 1:17 PM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <[email-masked] 
> <mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi!
>
>     The authors of 'Operational management of Loop Free Alternates'
>     (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-01)
>     have requested that rtgwg adopt their draft as a WG document.
>
>     Authors and Contributors: Please respond indicating whether or not
>     you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress
>     until we have received a response from each author/contributor.
>
>     Please send any comments to the list by April 16, 2013.
>
>     Thanks!!
>
>     Alvaro.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg