Subject: Re: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay

From: Pierre Francois <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:47:55 +0200

Hello Chris,

I am not aware of IPR related to this document.

Regards,

Pierre.

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Chris Bowers <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
>  
>  
> _____________________________________________
> From: Chris Bowers 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 12:26 PM
> To: 'RTGWG' <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]' <[email-masked]>
> Subject: RE: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
>  
>  
> RTGWG,
>  
> The consensus appears to be for the WG to request publication of this draft as a standards track document.
>  
> We still need IPR responses from two of the authors before we can proceed.
>  
> Thanks,
> Chris and Jeff
>  
> _____________________________________________
> From: Chris Bowers 
> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 3:43 PM
> To: RTGWG <[email-masked]>
> Subject: WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay
>  
>  
> RTGWG,
>  
> This email starts the two week WG last call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay.
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay/
>  
> Please indicate support for or opposition to the publication of this
> standards track document, along with the reasoning for that support or
> opposition.
>  
> IPR:
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
> this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
> response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. The document will
> not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
> each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>  
> The document currently has the following IPR disclosure associated
> with it.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2565/
>  
> This last call will end on Friday June 16th.
>  
> Thanks,
> Chris and Jeff
>