Subject: Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-architecture] Section 8 - Security Considerations (#31)

From: Nancy <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:14:47 -0700

Hmmm....I meant integrity.  Confidentiality I think is a should and needed only for privacy so will need to clarify this.  Thanks for catching it.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture/issues/31#issuecomment-122700134