Subject: [sacm] IETF 96 Conflict Avoidance

From: Adam Montville <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 10:03:26 -0500

Hi.  I have the following as a list of conflicts to avoid for IETF 96.  Please offer your requests for additional conflicts to add.  Keep in mind that the more 1st priority conflicts we need to avoid, the less likely we’ll get two, nicely spaced slots.

1st Priority:
  anima
  core
  dots
  i2nsf
  ipsecme
  saag
  mile
  jose
  cose
  spasm (if chartered)
  cfrg

2nd Priority:
  radext
  ace
  netmod
  curdle
  tls

3rd Priority:
  NONE YET

I’d like to get this wrapped up over the next week, so please respond by 23:59 UTC on Friday, May 13.

Kind regards,

Adam