Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Should SACM scope statements belong in the terminology draft? (#64)

From: adammontville <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 07:06:52 -0700

I would propose that we remove "The SACM architecture and corresponding models focus on data in motion" from the definition of Data In Motion; I also proposed that we remove "In the context of SACM, data models for data at rest are out of scope" from the definition of Data At Rest.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/64#issuecomment-377531588