Subject: rfc2222bis: confidentiality and integrity

From: [email-masked] (Sam Hartman)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:15:37 -0400 (EDT)

Hi.  There's another change I thought would be editorial but
apparently is not.  The document currently says in section 1 that
confidentiality protection usually implies integrity protection.

This seems less than ideal from a security standpoint.  I believe that
applications need to be able to depend on the fact that
confidentiality protection comes along with integrity protection.

I propose to drop the word usually.