Subject: RE: [seamoby] Context example/ requirement for L2 PPP+

From: "Gary Kenward" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:30:50 -0500

Look fine with me. Perhaps we could include this kind of information
as an appendix to the draft.
 
My only comment is that I wouldn't call this "L2 state", I would call it
sub-network convergence layer state, or L3- state.
 
Semantics, I know, but important semantics. We already have a layer 2,
and it's outside of our charter.
 
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: Mat Horan [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 11:59 AM
To: seamoby
Subject: [seamoby] Context example/ requirement for L2 PPP+

In our view of L2 context requirements I'd like to submit the following
items for consideration.  We understand this could broach on the edge of
solution space and definitely in the requirements space, but would like to
put this out there in the interest of defining what some L2 context needs to
consist of.  Since we are attempting to more thoroughly define some of the
context types (Sect. 3.2) we wanted to discuss this one.  Comments?

Mat Horan, Network Engineer
COM DEV Wireless Group
805.544.1089 x2244 (v), 805.544.2055 (f)
http://www.comdev.cc