Subject: RE: [Seamoby] [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Toke n?

From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:52:10 -0600

John,

Are you soliciting opinions on these alternatives as well?

Madjid

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of
John Loughney SEAMOBY-Issues
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:55 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [Seamoby] [issue30] How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?

New submission from John Loughney <[email-masked]>:

In case nAR requests the transfer by a CTR message, the pAR must verify
the MN's authorization token. If this token is unvalid, what do we do ?

Possible solutions:

 - nothing ? the pAR does not answer to nAR.
 - pAR indicates the error to nAR:
	* In the CTD message.
	* In a error message which could carry error information.

others ?

----------
category: Editorial
document: draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-05.txt
messages: 39
nosy: jloughney
priority: Should Fix
status: No Discussion
title: How to handle bad MN's authorization Token?
_____________________________________________________________
Seamoby CTP Issues <[email-masked]>
<http://danforsberg.info:8080/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp/issue30>
_____________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby