Subject: public key subsystem document.

From: Bill Sommerfeld <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:18:24 -0400

Based on the nature and tone of the comments (nitpickers are out in
force; no real architectural issues), looks like there's
rough consensus that it should be a work item.

If anyone disagrees, please speak up and explain why soon..

WG chair comments (please fix before resubmitting as
draft-ietf-secsh-*):

 - I18N issue on comments (mentioned earlier); also needs cite to the
   relevant I18N RFC in the references section

 - no security considerations section!

 - nit: rename references section to "normative references."
  
					- Bill