Subject: Re: Default match types and for_every_part

From: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:34:37 +0200

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 12:21 +0100, Nigel Swinson wrote:

> I think it should be foreverypart, not for_every_part.  We already
> have addheader, deleteheader, fileinto.  We don't have add_header,
> delete_header, file_into.

I think so, too.

actually, I think I prefer "foreachpart", since "each" is more commonly
used in iteration context in other programming languages.
-- 
Kjetil T.