Subject: Re: Suggested changes to address Cullen's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-sieve-3028bis-12.txt

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:25:06 +0200

Since loop detection is so hacky, I suggest the following to address 
magnification instead: If a sieve script/interpreter generates a new 
message (ie. without received fields), the message «SHOULD contain 
exactly one address in From, SHOULD have no Reply-To field and SHOULD 
have an Auto-Submitted field.».

Arnt