Subject: [SUA issue 5] SUAv7, M3UAv8: Heartbeat Procedures

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:29:02 +0300

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: 06 August, 2001 22:41
To: Loughney John (NRC/Helsinki); Lyndon Ong
Subject: Fwd: SUAv7, M3UAv8: Heartbeat Procedures

Attached is an issued for SUA Last Call.

Realignment of SUA Heartbeat procedures.

--brian

------_=_
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: SUAv7, M3UAv8: Heartbeat Procedures
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 22:27:15 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.78)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email-masked]>
Content-Type: text/plain

Greg, John,

Were the heartbeat procedures going to be updated?  Certainly there
is no reason why an SGP should not be able to send BEAT and expect
BEAT ACK, even if it has not yet received ASP UP.  BEAT may be the
only way that the SGP has of identifying a "dead" ASP which is
holding open an association but is never going to send ASP UP.
The SGP could clearly drop the association if the BEAT Ack doesn't
come back per the procedure.

Was there some common text for this procedure?  Was it going to be
included in SUA and M3UA?

--Brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email-masked]
http://www.openss7.org/

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[email-masked]

------_=_NextPart_000_01C12488.3DDB697D--

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]