Subject: Re: [M3UA Issue 1&2] - RC and NA

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:51:28 -0500

Lyndon,

It is clear that RC MUST be in the message when not implied
by the association.  Anything less and interoperability will
fail by inspection.  Please place the statement as to when
RC MUST be included in the message into the draft.

--brian

Lyndon Ong wrote:                                          (Tue, 02 Oct 2001 09:16:08)
> Folks,
> 
> I've exchanged some email with Greg and Javier,
> and for this next version of M3UA I believe the
> text will come out with RC and NA both as 
> optional format parameters in DATA and SNMM,
> and leaving it open as to when these are present
> in the messages (have not seen the final text,
> mind you).
> 
> Since we seem to be having difficulty reaching
> agreement on the specific conditions for 
> inclusion of RC and NA, leaving it open for 
> configuration may be the best option for the
> time being.  We can modify this after we have
> some more operational experience with the protocol,
> as it goes from Proposed to Draft version.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> L. Ong
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
> http://phone.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email-masked]
http://www.openss7.org/

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]