Subject: m3ua 10, sua 9: SSNM to inactive ASPs

From: Andrew Booth <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:26:09 -0500

Hi All,

This is a resend, sorry if it arrives twice.

I've been concentrating mostly on SUA, but recently noticed a few
procedures that are
different between M3UA draft 10 and SUA draft 9. In particular:

In M3UA draft 10, SSNM messages SHOULD NOT be sent to inactive ASPs (
this was
changed in version 10 after some debate on the list ).
In SUA draft 9, SSNM messages MAY be sent to inactive ASPs (this was
changed in
version 9, as was recommended after the SUA bakeoff ).

Will these procedures be consolidated at some point?  If so, I would
like to put in
my vote for the current SUA approach.

Andrew

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]