Subject: RE: [Sigtran] FW: Protocol Action: 'Stream Control Transmission P rotocol Management Information Base' to Proposed Standard

From: "J.Javier Pastor (KI/EEM)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:54:20 +0200

Hi Nitin,

The RFC number is not assigned yet...

Cheers // Javier.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nitin Vairagare [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: miércoles, 27 de agosto de 2003 17:34
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] FW: Protocol Action: 'Stream Control 
> Transmission
> Protocol Management Information Base' to Proposed Standard
> 
> 
> What is the RFC number allocated to this?
> 
> Nitin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IESG [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:00 PM
> To: IETF-Announce
> Cc: Internet Architecture Board; RFC Editor; [email-masked]
> Subject: Protocol Action: 'Stream Control Transmission Protocol
> Management Information Base' to Proposed Standard 
> 
> 
> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Stream Control Transmission 
> Protocol Management Information Base'
> <draft-ietf-sigtran-sctp-mib-10.txt> 
> as a Proposed Standard. This document is the product of the Signaling 
> Transport Working Group. 
> 
> The IESG contact persons are Jon Peterson and Allison Mankin.
> 
> Technical Summary
> 
> The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a reliable
> transport protocol operating on top of a connectionless packet
> network such as IP. It is designed to transport PSTN signaling
> messages over the connectionless packet network, but is capable of
> broader applications.
> 
> This memo defines the Management Information Base (MIB) module which
> describes the minimum set of objects needed to manage the
> implementation of the SCTP.
> 
> There is one existing nit that we need to fix in an RFC-editor note - 
> namely that the SIZE restriction of 115 octets on the 
> sctpAssocRemHostName needs to be removed (should be 255).
>    
> Working Group Summary
>    
> The SIGTRAN WG and the TSVWG WG supported this document.
>    
> Protocol Quality
>    
> This specification was reviewed for the IESG by Bert Wijnen and Jon
> Peterson. Further MIB review was performed by the participants of 
> the mreview mailing list.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> 

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran