Subject: RE: [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 3: Domain filter vs. resource filter

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:04:16 +0300

A week has passed without comments on this issue. Therefore I conclude that the proposal agreed on at the interim is acceptable.

Thanks,
Hisham

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf
> Of ext [email-masked]
> Sent: 31.May.2004 15:48
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Simple] Event Filtering Issue 3: Domain filter vs. resource
> filter
> 
> 
> Some situations may arise where a subscriber may want to 
> create a filter for a domain where the subscription may be 
> fanned out to, but override it with a filter to a specific resource.
> 
> In this following example, a filter is set for example.com 
> and for [email-masked] that overrides the domain filter.
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>       <filter-set xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:simple-filter"
>                          xmlns:pidf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf">
>             <filter id="8439" uri="sip:example1.com">
>                <what>
>        	     
> <include>//pidf:tuple/pidf:status/pidf:basic</include>
>    		</what>
>             </filter>
>             <filter id="999" uri="sip:[email-masked]">
>                <what>
>        	    <include 
> type="namespace">urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf</include>
>        	    <exclude>//pidf:tuple/pidf:note</exclude>
>    		</what>
>             </filter>
>       </filter-set>
> 
> There were no objections to this behaviour in the interim. If 
> there aren't any objections on the mailing list, I will add 
> some clarification text on this issue.
> 
> Regards,
> Hisham
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Simple mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple
> 

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple