Subject: [Simple] MSRP-10: Editorial comments

From: Magnus Westerlund <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:25:46 +0100

Hi,

Some editorial details found when reading the draft.

1. Section 4, page 7, first paragraph:

"When Alice receives Bob's answer, she checks to see if
    she has an existing connection to Bob."

This should be clarified that it is a MSRP connection that needs to be 
checked if it exist. Thus I would propose to make it:

"When Alice receives Bob's answer, she checks to see if
    she has an existing connection for MSRP to Bob."

2. Section 5.4, page 12, last paragraph:
"  A connection SHOULD not be closed while there are sessions associated
    with it."

Correct to "SHOULD NOT"

3. Section 7.1, second paragraph:
"If the request has a body, it must contain
    a Content-Type header field."

Shouldn't the "must" be a "MUST"?

4. Section 7.3.1 last line on page 21:
"Receivers MUST not assume the chunks will be delivered in order or"

Shouldn't "MUST not" be "MUST NOT"?

5. Their is a number of repetitions on how "Success-Report" and 
"Failure-Report" is handled in the text.

6. Section 8.1, page 25:
The BNF format does not contain any indication that it is following 
2234, and the "token" is missing reference to the syntax chapter.

7. Section 15.1: What type of port is going to be registered?
A IANA managed port (0-1023), or a Registered port (1024-49151).

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple