Subject: RE: [Sip] 407 Proxy Authentication Required with ACK

From: Jonathan Rosenberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 16:23:59 -0400

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Undery [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:25 AM
> To: Sami Keski-Kasari; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Sip] 407 Proxy Authentication Required with ACK
> 
> 
> 
> An ACK should never generate a response (section 5.1.1 
> paragraph 2) so any
> further discussion is really meaningless, the sipd is at fault if it
> responds to an ACK.
> 
> However the tables 4 and 5 should really be changed so that 
> all headers are
> marked as  "-" in responses to ACKs. 

Good point. Fixed.

> Paragraph 2 of section 
> 5.1.1 perhaps
> also ought to be "The ACK request MUST NOT generate responses for any
> transport protocol.", just to make it absolutely explicit.

Yes, thats right. Fixed. In general, the use of MUST/MAY/SHOULD in many
places needs to be improved.

Thanks,
Jonathan R.

---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[email-masked]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip