Subject: RE: [Sip] manyfolks comment

From: Adam Roach <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:35:02 -0600

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:[email-masked]]
> 
> I'm not yet sure, what CSeq to set for all the PRACKs. 
> Obviously, all UASs 
> deserve CSeq(invite)+1 but the idea of sending multiple 
> "parallel" transactions 
> with the same CSeq is still surprising to me. 

Keep in mind:

- CSeqs are scoped to dialogs
- Dialogs are identified by the set (call-id, local-tag, remote-tag)
- 1xx responses from different sources to a forked request will
  have remote-tags unique to the source

/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip