Subject: RE: [Sip] New draft on coexistence of SIP identity and P-Asserted-ID

From: "Peterson, Jon" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 17:29:07 -0400

> P.S. Jon - if you insisted on 3324 as a prerequisite for 3325, then why 
> did you let them get away without a normative reference?

RFC3324 is an Informational that doesn't contain any 2119 language. Back then, we wouldn't have thought that RFC3324 could have been a normative reference. Given the language in Section 1 of 3325 (especially the 2nd paragraph), we would certainly cast it as a normative reference today. The distinction between normative and informative references has never been crystal-clear, and was even murkier a few years ago.

Jon Peterson
NeuStar, Inc.

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip