Subject: [Sip] What to do with SIP SAML draft

From: "Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 23:23:03 +0200

I support option 1, with further work in the integration with authorization scenarios

Regards, Antonio

On Jun 6, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Dean Willis wrote:

>
> Our current charter and slightly-stale milestones include a  
> deliverable for SAML:
>
> Jul 2006 -- Using SAML for SIP (PS)
>
>
> At the IETF 65, we discussed the Tschofenig draft, currently  
> available as:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tschofenig-sip-saml-05.txt
>
> We didn't have a firm consensus in the room for what to do with  
> this, so It'd like to discuss it now.
>
>
> Our options include:
>
> 1) Adopt this draft as a WG document and keep working on it.
>
> 2) Decide we don't need to solve the problem just yet and abandon  
> the milestone.
>
> 3) Let Hannes and team keep working on it until we decide it has  
> reached critical mass, and keep slipping the milestone along.
>
> 4) Do something entirely different.
>
>
> So, what do you people think?
>
> --
> Dean
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors at cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping at ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Antonio F. Gómez Skarmeta
Dept. Ingeniería de la Información y las Comunicaciones
Facultad de Informática
Universidad de Murcia
Apartado 4021
30001 Murcia
Telf: +34-968-364607
fax: +34-968-364151

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip