Subject: [Sip] RE: Location-conveyance: ISSUE #1 - self signed certificates

From: "DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 03:23:20 +0200

There has been no response on this issue, and therefore I consider this
issue closed. 

The information on self-signed certifications will be removed from
draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance.

Regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drage, Keith (Keith) 
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:26 AM
> To: 'IETF SIP List'
> Subject: Location-conveyance: ISSUE #1 - self signed certificates
> 
> (As SIP WG chair)
> 
> During the review of the WGLC comments, we have identified 
> some issues where we need consensus calls on the list. These 
> are in one call per message.
> 
> There is mention of self-signed certificates in 
> draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance. It is proposed to remove 
> that requirement:
> 
>    "Self-signed certificates SHOULD NOT be used for 
> protecting a PIDF, 
>    as the sender does not have a secure identity of the recipient."
> 
> Essentially we agreed that if this statement was necessary, 
> it should be made in draft-ietf-sip-certs, rather than in 
> location-conveyance.
> 
> We will assume that this removal represents WG consensus 
> unless we hear otherwise from the WG in 7 calendar days from 
> the posting of this message.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip