Subject: [Sip] Comments on sparks-sip-steps-to-draft

From: Cullen Jennings <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 09:34:36 -0700

It seems odd to me that a revision of 3261 would need to normatively  
reference SIP-T or SCTP. These seem like they should be extensions.

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip