Subject: [Sipping] [Fwd: RE: SIP WG bugzilla instance]

From: Robert Sparks <[email-masked]>
Date: 19 Mar 2003 12:56:18 -0800

All -

I apologize now for violating the no-crosspost policy, but
this spans all the groups. Please, please, reply _ONLY_ to
[email-masked] (which is what should happen if you hit your
reply button if I've built this message correctly).

If you have any opinions, positive or negative, about our
use of bugzilla for issue tracking and whether other groups
should follow the model, now would be a good time to comment.

Thanks!

RjS

-----Forwarded Message-----

> From: [email-masked]
> To: [email-masked], [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: SIP WG bugzilla instance
> Date: 19 Mar 2003 22:46:52 +0200
> 
> Robert,
> 
> Any comments on how the WG & WG Chairs like it?
> 
> John
> 
> > At the session on improving working group chair training
> > (and chair effectiveness), tools came up. The SIP related
> > working groups have been effectively using a bugzilla variant
> > to track document issues and help drive open issues to
> > conclusion.
> > 
> > It's available at http://www.sipwg.org (or http://bugs.sipit.net).
> > 
> > One point to bring forth at the beginning - we use this as
> > a tracking tool, not an alternative venue for list discussion.
> > Document/issue owners are able to make changes to a bug -
> > people ask the owner to add things to the tracking tool on
> > the appropriate list. The chairs make sure that the owners
> > accurately capture threads on the tracking tool.
> > 
> > RjS
> > 
> > 
> > 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP