Subject: [Sipping] Comments on cc-conferencing-02

From: "Eric Burger" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 04:44:14 -0500

Section 3.4:
I still don't understand why there is any normative stricture on a conference-aware UA to subscribe to the conference package.  If anything, the DEFINITION of a conference-aware UA is a UA that knows to subscribe to the conference package.  Thus the statement is rather self-referential and doesn't add any value.

Section 4:
I would offer that keeping the goal of small primitives, put together in novel ways by user agents, means that the call flows in this section are, by definition, informative and NOT normative.  That is, there is no "right way" to implement the primitives.  If the UA's are 3261 compliant, any combination of 3261 commands will work.

Section 4.1:
Why must the conference URI be reserved?  True, it doesn't say MUST, but it reads like it says "must."

Nits:
Section 3.2, third paragraph, first sentence:
the automatic creation a new conference
the automatic creation of a new conference
                       ^^^

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP