Subject: [Sipping] RE: [Sip-implementors] Re: Doubt indraft-ietf-simple-message-sessions-08 [bcc][faked-from]

From: "Christian Jansson" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:27:56 +0100

>The syntax allows port to be null.
>
>That being said, the MSRP spec requires an explicit value for port
>whenever the MSRP URL is exchanged in the SDP. But the MSRP relay spec
>allows for a null port in certain narrow circumstances.

Just checking, msrp://[email-masked]: would be valid? (notice the ":"
on the end). If not, the idea proposed to have port = 1*digit seems
good.

/ Christian

>
>Hope this helps!
>
>Ben.
>
>
>On Jan 19, 2005, at 3:30 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>       As per the grammar of Msrp-Url,
>> MSRP_urls = msrp-scheme "://" [userinfo "@"] hostport ["/"
>>       resource] ";" transport
>>
>> and hostport as per RFC2396 is:
>> hostport      = host [ ":" port ]
>> port          = *digit
>>
>> The doubt is that ,can the port be NULL or it should have been
>> port  =1 *digit
>>
>> Please clarify the doubt.
>>

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP