Subject: AW: AW: [Sipping] Comments on draft-poetzl-sipping-call-completio n-00 .txt

From: "Alexeitsev, D" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:27:54 +0200

Hello Gonzalo

>The FIFO management you are talking about here consist of managing the 
>"access to a specific resource", statement that you do not agree with in 
>the paragraph at the top of this email. You propose a FIFO queue in 
>order to decide who gets access to the resource (i.e., being able to 
>talk to the user).

The proposed FIFO notification management policy solves the resource access issue on the level of event framework without a need for the separate protocol. This also enables a seamless interworking with the ISDN implementation of the service. The floor control solution would greatly complicate such interworking.

The are already examples of similar extension to the event framework - "Event Notification Extension for Notification Throttling" http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle-04.txt. 

This draft was one of the triggers for us to define an extension for the events framework to control the notification distribution logic.

Greetings,
Denis Alexeitsev

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP