From: "Jim Schaad" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:11:09 -0700

I believe that the Microsoft implentation would not reject the object based on
the version number, but would reject the object on a parse failure if any unknown
recipient info appeared in the message.

jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked]
> [mailto:[email-masked]]On Behalf Of Peter Gutmann
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 5:32 PM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: Comments to draft-ietf-smime-rfc2630bis-01
> 
> 
> 
> "Pawling, John" <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> >Nobody (except for Peter) has stated that their 
> implementations rejected an
> >EnvelopedData based solely on the version value.
> 
> OTOH nobody (except for you) has stated that their 
> implementations won't reject
> an EnvelopedData based solely on the version value.  I'd 
> really like to see
> some comments from other implementors - Baltimore, MS, 
> Entrust, OpenSSL,
> Netscape, what do all of these implementations do?  If the 
> vendors won't
> respond, perhaps someone who has all this stuff installed for 
> interop testing
> or whatever could feed them some EnvelopedData with a weird 
> version number (eg
> 42) to see what they do.
> 
> Peter.
>