Subject: ally

From: "Greer Lizzie" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 16:06:11 -0700

until we get somebody to agree to them and act on them, it hardly makes a difference.
In the case of XML, you "internationalize" XML by providing the ITS markup to people who create a document or to localizers.
But do we stand by our own criterias of quality? And no way to have an overview of the quality checking of the web page. There are a few issues to solve for achieving this which I hope we will find an answer.
We think there should be a tool to gather observations made on a single document by various validators and quality checkers, and summarize all of that neatly for the user.
What software is safe? When there will be issues which seems more difficult to overcome, we will explain the solution we have found and adopted to solve them.
But he also needs to know that there is an existing title of the book in Japanese.
This leads to several issues for editing clients, but also for servers.
What software is secure?
So in working on ITS, you help people in many languages. Some  will say "Wow, you are moving too fast! Think of it an aggregator of observations made by a number of different tools. But he also needs to know that there is an existing title of the book in Japanese.
This leads to several issues for editing clients, but also for servers. In the case of XML, you "internationalize" XML by providing the ITS markup to people who create a document or to localizers.
And even better than those, which were mostly developed after-the-fact at the errata stage, are the hundreds of RDF and OWL tests that were developed concurrent with the Recommendations. So in working on ITS, you help people in many languages. You are talking about "localization" all the time.
Small closed communities are a lot easier to manage.
As always we have much more work to do than we have people to do it, so we would very much welcome assistance from people in the conformance testing community.
Upcoming accessibility and markup specifications fail on both counts.