Subject: RE: [midcom] MIDCOM Protocol Semantics <-> SNMPv3

From: "Harrington, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:51:42 -0500

Hi,

This has been answered on the midcom WG mailing list. Please do not
include the snmpv3 mailing list in further discussion.

Thanks,
Dbh
David Harrington            
[email-masked]
co-chair, IETF SNMPv3 WG (now concluded)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:56 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [midcom] MIDCOM Protocol Semantics <-> SNMPv3
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear MIDCOM experts
> 
> The "semantics draft" is now going for informational RFC in my
> understanding. SNMPv3 was recommended as MIDCOM protocol end of last
> year to my knowledge.
> I'm wondering whether
> (1) SNMPv3 is used as "MIDCOM protocol syntax" for the 
> "MIDCOM Protocol
> Semantics"?
> and
> (2) if yes, will there be an additional "MIB plane" for provisioning
> midcom boxes (besides the dynamic configuration actions according
> "MIDCOM Protocol Semantics")?
> 
> Thanks,
> Albrecht Schwarz
> ALCATEL
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> midcom mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
>