Subject: [Softwires] RE: interim meeting

From: "Durand, Alain" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:52:36 -0400

Pekka,

We are trying to model our kick-off metting on the procedure that was
followed during the creation of v6ops, i.e. announcing the meeting a
month in advance, anticipating the formal creation of the wg.

  - Alain.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 12:29 PM
> To: David Ward
> Cc: Durand, Alain; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: interim meeting
> 
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, David Ward wrote:
> > Also we would like to announce the Interim WG meeting (in 
> anticipation 
> > of the formation of the WG). It will be held in Paris, France  the 
> > week of Oct 9th depending on participants availability.
> 
> Just a procedural warning...
> 
> There may be a procedural problem with a _WG_ interim meeting.
> 
> First off, there probably can't be a _WG_ interim meeting 
> before WG has been formed.  Interim meetings need to be 
> announced on IETF-Announce (plus additional requirements) at 
> least a month in advance, as set down in:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/Interim-meetings.txt
> 
> Of course, I guess may be OK to have an informal, pre-WG 
> interim meeting, subject to the spirit of the IESG statement, 
> but I'd say decisions shouldn't be made at such a meeting.
> 
> (As a comment on the earlier thread: while Hawaii might be 
> 'fair' for the Western US/Asia, it's pretty far from Europe :-)
> 
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> 

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires