Subject: [Softwires] Mailing list question to gauge consensus on 4rd-U vs MAP

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:50:30 +0200

=====================================================================
Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track,
the other being published as experimental or informational.
Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track.
Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fernando Vela, ONO:                 YES
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================================

Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track:
4rd-U or MAP?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fernando vela, ONO:                 MAP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alain Durand <[email-masked]>
Date: 4 April 2012 23:14
Subject: [Softwires] Mailing list question to gauge consensus on 4rd-U vs MAP
To: "[email-masked] WG" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, Softwire Chairs <[email-masked]>

Dear Softwire wg members:

At the Paris IETF Softwire meeting, we had presentations on MAP (taken as a whole)  and
4rd-U. We got very strong feedback that we needed to select one
solution to cover that full stateless case, not two, and that we should make this
decision relatively quickly.

During Paris meeting, we asked the following additional question:
Do you prefer MAP or 4rd-U?
We got about 1/3 support for 4rd-U and 2/3 for MAP.

The real gauge of consensus is the mailing list, so we would like
to ask the same questions to the list.

=====================================================================
Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a whole) on the standard track,
the other being published as experimental or informational.
Answering YES to this question means you agree we cannot publish both as standard track.
Answering NO to this question means you want to see both advance on the standard track.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: YES or NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================================

Questions 2: Which one do you want to see placed on the Standards Track:
4rd-U or MAP?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your full name, your affiliation, your choice: 4rd-U or MAP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

=====================================================================

Please fill out the following form and reply to the list
by Wednesday 4/10 5pm EDT.

Note: Use this thread ONLY for expressing your support to
one OR the other, and redirect any discussions to other threads.
That would help up gauge consensus.

Alain & Yong.
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Este mensaje es CONFIDENCIAL, siendo para uso exclusivo de su destinatario. Si usted no es el destinatario, por favor, reenvie el mensaje inmediatamente a la direccion remitente y proceda a su borrado.

CABLEUROPA, S.A.U. (ONO) incluira su direccion de correo electronico, asi como los datos de contacto que le facilite, en un fichero con el fin de gestionar el envio de comunicaciones profesionales y/o personales de sus empleados y personal externo. Para ejercitar sus derechos de acceso, rectificacion, cancelacion y oposicion, remita su solicitud al Dpto. Asesoria Juridica, calle Basauri, 7-9, urb. La Florida, Aravaca 28023 Madrid.