Subject: [Speechsc] FWD: SRCP Draft

From: "David R. Oran" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:48:54 -0400

Abt, I'm forwarding this message to the mailing list, since you are clearly 
asking a question of general interest to the speechsc wg community.

My personal view is that speechsc becomes an important capability in 
VXML-capable gateways and voice browsers as soon as you want to put the 
browsing in a separate server or gateway from the back-end speech services.

Many people are already doing this today with the earlier MRCP protocol, 
which was the rationale for forming this WG in the first place - market 
demand for a distributed solution to speech services.

Best Regards, Dave Oran.

---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: Thursday, August 22, 2002 11:01 AM +0200
From: Abt Roland <[email-masked]>
To: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
Subject: SRCP Draft

Dear Mr. Oran

Today, I read your draft about the srcp protocol, when suddenly a question
about the text came up.
In section 4 'SRCP Framework' you have written that VoiceXML Gateways are
outside the scope of this protocol.
According to your personal opinion, when does the time come, when TTS- or
ASR-engine programmer use the SRCP protocol and the programmers of VoiceXML
Gateway are forced to do also?

Best regards,

Roland Abt
Praktikant

SIEMENS Building Automation
Laubisrütistrasse 50
CH-8712 Staefa
Tel.(direct): +41 1 928 67 28
Fax (direct): +41 1 928 63 11
mailto:[email-masked]

---------- End Forwarded Message ----------

-----------------------------------------------------------
David R. Oran                   Phone/Fax: +1 978 264 2048
Cisco Systems                   VoIP: +1 408 571 4576
7 Ladyslipper Lane              Email: [email-masked]
Acton, MA 01720

_______________________________________________
Speechsc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc