Subject: Re: [Taps] Murray Kucherawy's Yes on draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11: (with COMMENT)

From: Tommy Pauly <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:02:16 -0700

Hi Murray,

Thanks for the review! You can find an updated version of the document, that incorporates the nits you point out, here:

https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html <https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html>

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Mar 28, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11: Yes
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a really useful summary, especially for people without deep background
> in transport security.  It'll make a great reference document.
> 
> Section 4.3:
> * "Specific" should be "Specifically"
> * "They have a dependencies on" -- should be "dependency"
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps