Subject: Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5288 (4694)

From: Megan Ferguson <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:06:14 -0700

All,

Thank you for your input on this errata report and apologies for the delayed reply.

We have updated as requested.  As this thread involved a number of responses, please review the text as it currently appears at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5288&eid=4694 and let us know if any further updates are necessary.

RFC Editor/mf

On Jun 15, 2016, at 4:11 AM, Aaron Zauner <[email-masked]> wrote:

> 
>> On 14 Jun 2016, at 19:25, Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>> s/it's/its/ in one place in your errata text, Aaron.
> 
> Thank you. I suggest the RFC Errata editors change text and further additions/recommendations by others along the way when publishing (if that's the right way to proceed, I'm quite unfamiliar with the errata process and the information on it is a bit terse, to be honest).
> 
> Aaron