Subject: Re: [TLS] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

From: Martin Thomson <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:49:23 +1000

I responded to Spencer regarding the nit.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 4:49 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <[email-masked]> wrote:
> One minor comment the title of sec 5: not sure if "deprecating" is the best
> word as that maybe be read as "moved to historic" in IETF world...

For this, until we move all of RFC 6066 to historic/historical, I
think that deprecating is clear enough.