Subject: Suggested fields in ECML v2

From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:11:23 -0400

Hi,

There has been a suggestion in another form that two fields by added to ECML:

> Ecom_Wallet_Location
> 	and
> Ecom_User_Certificate_URL
> 
The first is to provide more support for server wallets. Both with a suggested minimum size to be supported as 128.  I think these fields are not such a bad idea but I don't know how well they fit into the current naming scheme.

Are there any objections to adding them?

> Thanks,
> Donald