Subject: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - tactics

From: "Black, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 05:15:59 +0000

The plan from here on draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation:

In my "copious spare time" today and tomorrow, I will prepare a -04 version that reflects meeting discussion and responds to most of Gorry's comments (and I will try to get a draft version of the minutes posted).  There will be a WG adoption call on that -04 version of the draft.  That -04 draft will contain "MUST NOT use" language for ECT(1).  So ...

READ THIS PARAGRAPH TWICE ;-) - A WG adoption call is **NOT** the same as a WG Last Call.  The question for a WG adoption call is whether the draft is a reasonable starting point for the work.  WG adoption of a draft does not determine the WG position on technical issues in the draft, in contrast to WGLC, which does.  In particular, it is completely reasonable to support WG adoption of a draft even when one has serious disagreements with some of its contents, and it is likewise completely reasonable for a WG to make serious changes to a draft after adoption.

Thanks, --David
--------------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
Dell EMC, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953     Cell: +1 (978) 394-7754
[email-masked]  <=== NEW ===
--------------------------------------------------------