Subject: Tr: No posting flag

From: Julien ÉLIE <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:44:44 +0200

Hi Charles,

> Such a flag would be meaningless except in moderated groups (and one-way
> groups really OUGHT to be moderated).

I agree.  Still, it prevents people from adding Approved: headers and posting
such articles.  Not everyone uses pgpmoose!

> Even if your intention was that presence of the flag in a checkgroups
> would change the ACTIVE flag to 'n', no existing server would do so

Hmm... INN 2.5 could do so :)

> and it would be a long time before it was widely adopted.

Not longer than the use of the Injection-Info: header.

-- 
Julien ÉLIE

« A facto ad ius non datur consequentia. »